Describe various measures taken in India for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) before and after signing the ‘Sendai Framework for DRR (2015–2030)’. How is this framework different from the ‘Hyogo Framework for Action, 2005’?
(UPSC 2018, 15 Marks, )
भारत में आपदा जोखिम न्यूनीकरण (DRR) के लिए 'सेन्दाई फ्रेमवर्क फॉर DRR (2015-2030)' पर हस्ताक्षर करने से पहले और बाद में उठाए गए विभिन्न उपायों का वर्णन करें। यह फ्रेमवर्क 'ह्योगो फ्रेमवर्क फॉर एक्शन, 2005' से कैसे भिन्न है?
Introduction
Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) is a critical aspect of India's development strategy, aiming to mitigate the impact of natural and man-made disasters. The Sendai Framework for DRR (2015-2030) marked a significant shift in global disaster management strategies, succeeding the Hyogo Framework for Action (2005). India, being a signatory to the Sendai Framework, has implemented various measures to enhance disaster resilience.
Explanation
Comparing the Measures in India before and after the ‘Sendai Framework for DRR (2015) for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR)
|
Aspect |
Before Sendai Framework (Pre-2015) |
After Sendai Framework (Post-2015) |
|
Policy Framework |
Less comprehensive and integrated DRR policies |
Adoption of the Sendai Framework with a focus on integration, coherence, and comprehensive policies |
|
Objectives |
Emphasis on response and recovery |
Shift towards a more proactive approach with a focus on risk reduction and resilience-building |
|
Risk Assessment |
Limited emphasis on systematic risk assessments |
Increased emphasis on systematic and science-based risk assessments, involving various stakeholders |
|
Community Involvement |
Limited community participation in DRR planning and execution |
Increased efforts to involve communities in risk reduction and preparedness activities, recognizing local knowledge and resilience |
|
Early Warning Systems |
Basic early warning systems |
Strengthening and expansion of early warning systems, including technological advancements and community-based systems |
|
Infrastructure Resilience |
Limited focus on building resilient infrastructure |
Increased emphasis on resilient infrastructure development, considering climate change impacts and disaster risk reduction measures |
|
International Collaboration |
Limited international collaboration and coordination |
Active participation in international collaboration, sharing best practices, and contributing to global DRR efforts |
'Sendai Framework for DRR (2015-2030) vs 'Hyogo Framework for Action, 2005'
|
Aspect |
Sendai Framework for DRR (2015-2030) |
Hyogo Framework for Action, 2005 |
|
Objective |
Emphasizes the substantial reduction of disaster risk and losses in lives, livelihoods, and health. |
Focused on building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. |
|
Time Period |
Covers the years 2015-2030. |
Encompassed the period 2005-2015. |
|
Scope |
Broader in scope, addressing various aspects of disaster risk reduction (DRR) beyond natural disasters. |
Primarily focused on natural disasters and their impact on sustainable development. |
|
Priority Areas |
Identifies four priority areas: understanding disaster risk, strengthening governance in DRR, investing in DRR for resilience, and enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response. |
Had five priority areas: ensure that DRR is a national priority, identify, assess, and monitor disaster risks, use knowledge, innovation, and education to build a culture of safety and resilience, reduce the underlying risk factors, and strengthen disaster preparedness for effective response. |
|
Global Targets |
Includes seven global targets to measure progress in reducing disaster risk. |
Featured five priorities for action but did not explicitly define global targets. |
|
Integration with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) |
Aligns with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and acknowledges the interlinkages between DRR and sustainable development. |
Recognizes the connection between disaster risk reduction and sustainable development but does not explicitly align with specific SDGs. |
|
Inclusivity and Participation |
Emphasizes the importance of the participation of all relevant stakeholders, including communities, and the integration of gender perspectives. |
Acknowledges the role of communities and stakeholders but does not explicitly highlight gender perspectives and inclusivity. |
Conclusion
India's journey in disaster risk reduction has evolved significantly with the transition from the Hyogo Framework to the Sendai Framework. The shift towards a more holistic and inclusive approach reflects a global commitment to building resilience and reducing the impact of disasters on communities and economies. As India continues to implement these measures, the focus remains on creating a safer and more sustainable future.